Table 3 from Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial | Semantic Scholar (2024)

Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu

Semantic ScholarSemantic Scholar's Logo
@article{Hansson2024PosteriorCC, title={Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial}, author={Stina Hansson and Naimi Johansson and Rune Lindsten and Sofia Petr{\'e}n and Farhan Bazargani}, journal={The European Journal of Orthodontics}, year={2024}, volume={46}, url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270094185}}
  • Stina Hansson, Naimi Johansson, F. Bazargani
  • Published in European Journal of… 29 May 2024
  • Medicine

A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing quad helix (QH) and rapid maxillary expanders (RME) in children in the early mixed dentition indicates that logistics around the patient’s treatment is a more important aspect than appliance used to decrease the number of visits and save chair time and thereby also costs.

View PDF

Figures and Tables from this paper

  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 2
  • table 3
  • figure 3
  • table 4
  • table 5
  • table 6
  • table 7
  • table 8

33 References

An RCT on clinical effectiveness and cost analysis of correction of unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift in specialist and general dentistry.
    Ola SolleniusSofia PetrénL. Bondemark

    Medicine

    European journal of orthodontics

  • 2019

Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition is recommended to be performed by a specialist orthodontist using the QH appliance, which had significantly lower costs than QH or EP treatment accomplished in general dentistry as well as EP treatments in specialist Orthodontic clinics.

Treatment of posterior crossbite comparing 2 appliances: a community-based trial.
    Fabiana GodoyJuliana Godoy-BezerraA. Rosenblatt

    Medicine

    American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial…

  • 2011
  • 48
  • Highly Influential
Early correction of posterior crossbite--a cost-minimization analysis.
    Sofia PetrénK. BjerklinL. MarkéL. Bondemark

    Medicine

    European journal of orthodontics

  • 2013

The results clearly show that in terms of cost-minimization, QH is the preferred method for correcting posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.

  • 31
  • PDF
Pain and discomfort during the first week of maxillary expansion using two different expanders: patient-reported outcomes in a randomized controlled trial
    Stina HanssonE. JosefssonR. LindstenA. MagnusonF. Bazargani

    Medicine

    European journal of orthodontics

  • 2022

During the initial 4 days of treatment, pain from the tongue and chafe from the appliance caused the most reported inconvenience in the patients in the QH group; a majority of reported visual analogue scale values were in the lower mid-range, suggesting low to moderate pain and discomfort in both groups.

  • 3
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Expansion of maxillary arches with crossbite: a systematic review of RCTs in the last 12 years.
    G. ZuccatiSerena CasciT. DoldoC. Clauser

    Medicine

    European journal of orthodontics

  • 2013

Most of the studies did not meet major methodological requirements; some studies were not relevant because of small sample size, possible bias and unaccounted for confounding variables, lack of blinding in measurements, and deficient statistical methods.

Deciduous dentition-anchored rapid maxillary expansion in crossbite and non-crossbite mixed dentition patients: reaction of the permanent first molar.
    M. CozzaniM. RosaP. CozzaniG. Siciliani

    Medicine

    Progress in orthodontics

  • 2003

This preliminary report describes our evaluation of the behavior of permanent maxillary first molars subsequent to rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in the mixed dentition in crossbite and

  • 61
Factors related to maxillary expander loss due to anchoring deciduous molars exfoliation during treatment in the mixed dentition phase.
    V. QuinziF. Federici CanovaF. A. RizzoG. MarzoM. RosaJ. Primožič

    Medicine

    European journal of orthodontics

  • 2020

The probability of a second deciduous molar to be successfully used as maxillary expander anchorage for at least 16 months is above 94 per cent; when at baseline, the corresponding premolar cusp is apical to the HPC line.

  • 8
  • PDF
Pain and discomfort during the first week of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using two different RME appliances: A randomized controlled trial.
    Ingalill FeldmannF. Bazargani

    Medicine

    The Angle orthodontist

  • 2017

Both tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME were generally well tolerated by the patients during the first week of treatment and no correlations were found between sex and pain and discomfort, analgesic consumption, and jaw function impairment.

  • 35
  • PDF
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.
    P. AgostinoA. UgoliniAlessio SignoriA. Silvestrini-BiavatiJayne E HarrisonPhilip Riley

    Medicine

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

  • 2000

Occlusal grinding in the primary dentition with/without the addition of an upper removable expansion plate was shown to be effective in preventing a posterior crossbite in thePrimary dentition from being perpetuated to the mixed and permanent dentitions.

  • 233
  • PDF
Evaluation of self-perceived pain and jaw function impairment in children undergoing slow and rapid maxillary expansion: A prospective clinical trial.
    Feras Abed Al JawadNajah Alhashimi

    Medicine

    The Angle orthodontist

  • 2021

Quadhelix for SME and conventional banded hyrax for RME were well tolerated by patients after 1 week and the decision to use either appliance could be based on factors not related to patient experiences.

  • 5
  • PDF

...

...

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

    Table 3 from Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial | Semantic Scholar (12)

    Table 3. Resources.

    Published in European Journal of Orthodontics 2024

    Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial

    Stina HanssonNaimi JohanssonR. LindstenSofia PetrénF. Bazargani

    Figure 5 of 11

    Table 3 from Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial | Semantic Scholar (2024)

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Pres. Carey Rath

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6083

    Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

    Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Pres. Carey Rath

    Birthday: 1997-03-06

    Address: 14955 Ledner Trail, East Rodrickfort, NE 85127-8369

    Phone: +18682428114917

    Job: National Technology Representative

    Hobby: Sand art, Drama, Web surfing, Cycling, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Leather crafting, Creative writing

    Introduction: My name is Pres. Carey Rath, I am a faithful, funny, vast, joyous, lively, brave, glamorous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.