Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjae028 - Corpus ID: 270094185
@article{Hansson2024PosteriorCC, title={Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial}, author={Stina Hansson and Naimi Johansson and Rune Lindsten and Sofia Petr{\'e}n and Farhan Bazargani}, journal={The European Journal of Orthodontics}, year={2024}, volume={46}, url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270094185}}
- Stina Hansson, Naimi Johansson, F. Bazargani
- Published in European Journal of… 29 May 2024
- Medicine
A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing quad helix (QH) and rapid maxillary expanders (RME) in children in the early mixed dentition indicates that logistics around the patient’s treatment is a more important aspect than appliance used to decrease the number of visits and save chair time and thereby also costs.
View PDF
Figures and Tables from this paper
- figure 1
- table 1
- table 2
- figure 2
- table 3
- figure 3
- table 4
- table 5
- table 6
- table 7
- table 8
33 References
- Ola SolleniusSofia PetrénL. Bondemark
- 2019
Medicine
European journal of orthodontics
Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition is recommended to be performed by a specialist orthodontist using the QH appliance, which had significantly lower costs than QH or EP treatment accomplished in general dentistry as well as EP treatments in specialist Orthodontic clinics.
- 10
- Fabiana GodoyJuliana Godoy-BezerraA. Rosenblatt
- 2011
Medicine
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial…
- 48
- Highly Influential
- Sofia PetrénK. BjerklinL. MarkéL. Bondemark
- 2013
Medicine
European journal of orthodontics
The results clearly show that in terms of cost-minimization, QH is the preferred method for correcting posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.
- 31
- PDF
- Stina HanssonE. JosefssonR. LindstenA. MagnusonF. Bazargani
- 2022
Medicine
European journal of orthodontics
During the initial 4 days of treatment, pain from the tongue and chafe from the appliance caused the most reported inconvenience in the patients in the QH group; a majority of reported visual analogue scale values were in the lower mid-range, suggesting low to moderate pain and discomfort in both groups.
- 3
- Highly Influential
- PDF
- G. ZuccatiSerena CasciT. DoldoC. Clauser
- 2013
Medicine
European journal of orthodontics
Most of the studies did not meet major methodological requirements; some studies were not relevant because of small sample size, possible bias and unaccounted for confounding variables, lack of blinding in measurements, and deficient statistical methods.
- M. CozzaniM. RosaP. CozzaniG. Siciliani
- 2003
Medicine
Progress in orthodontics
This preliminary report describes our evaluation of the behavior of permanent maxillary first molars subsequent to rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in the mixed dentition in crossbite and…
- 61
- V. QuinziF. Federici CanovaF. A. RizzoG. MarzoM. RosaJ. Primožič
- 2020
Medicine
European journal of orthodontics
The probability of a second deciduous molar to be successfully used as maxillary expander anchorage for at least 16 months is above 94 per cent; when at baseline, the corresponding premolar cusp is apical to the HPC line.
- 8
- PDF
- Ingalill FeldmannF. Bazargani
- 2017
Medicine
The Angle orthodontist
Both tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME were generally well tolerated by the patients during the first week of treatment and no correlations were found between sex and pain and discomfort, analgesic consumption, and jaw function impairment.
- 35
- PDF
- P. AgostinoA. UgoliniAlessio SignoriA. Silvestrini-BiavatiJayne E HarrisonPhilip Riley
- 2000
Medicine
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Occlusal grinding in the primary dentition with/without the addition of an upper removable expansion plate was shown to be effective in preventing a posterior crossbite in thePrimary dentition from being perpetuated to the mixed and permanent dentitions.
- 233
- PDF
- Feras Abed Al JawadNajah Alhashimi
- 2021
Medicine
The Angle orthodontist
Quadhelix for SME and conventional banded hyrax for RME were well tolerated by patients after 1 week and the decision to use either appliance could be based on factors not related to patient experiences.
- 5
- PDF
...
...
Related Papers
Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers
Table 3. Resources.
Published in European Journal of Orthodontics 2024
Posterior crossbite corrections in the early mixed dentition with quad helix or rapid maxillary expander: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Stina HanssonNaimi JohanssonR. LindstenSofia PetrénF. Bazargani
Figure 5 of 11